Tag Archives: John Dies at the End

John Dies at the End (The Film)

It’s time for another film-based-on-a-book review!

Two nights ago I decided to watch the film adaptation of John Dies at the End on Netflix.  It’s available for instant streaming.  For a link to the book on Amazon, just go to the Books I Recommend page.  Because I do recommend the book.  Highly.  It was awesome.  I talked about it in this post.  I haven’t read the sequel yet, but I will one of these days.

I will start with this warning, though: John Dies at the End, both the book and the movie, appeals to a very specific audience.  Let me see if I can explain by telling you the genre of the book and film.  I think it is best described as a psychedelic, horror, sci-fi, thriller, dark comedy, cult-classic.  Get it?  I hope so.

I know as an author I’m almost always going to tell you that you have to, have to, have to read the book at least once before or even after seeing the movie.  It’s what I do.  But I will admit that many movies can be enjoyed without reading the books they are based on.  Not this time.  This time I’m really going to stress trying the book out first.  Because if you don’t like the book, you are most certainly not going to like the movie.  And if you go into that movie blind, and it ends up not being your cup of tea, you might think I’m crazy for recommending it.

That being said, I did like the movie.  I was surprised by that.  The book had so many tightly woven and interconnected subtle details that I didn’t think a filmmaker would even know where to begin cutting it down and reworking it for the camera.  But this is how they did it – they stuck really close to the book.  For the most part.  They had the main character, David, offering voice-over narration throughout the film, and they framed it with an interview between David and a journalist named Arnie.  Just like in the book, these devices worked for the movie.

They did cut out a huge chunk of the middle portion of the book, but I understand why they did.  If they’d tried to leave everything in, the film would have been six hours long.  Also, you will notice that the special effects budget wasn’t terribly large, but they made it work.  It just contributed to the “cult classic” part of its many genres.

So, to sum up, I liked the movie.  It was a fun ride, and the actors were well chosen. Paul Giamatti was spot on as Arnie the journalist, Rob Mayes was a lovable, crazy John, and Chase Williamson showed us a believable everyman hero in his portrayal of David.  If you liked the book, I think you will be quite satisfied with the movie.

That’s all for now!

Strenuous (adj) – characterized by vigorous exertion, as action, efforts, life, etc.

Writer's-Block-Strip-25

P.S. Though the owner of the dog is just a fictitious character in my comic, the dog himself is based on real-life Radar.  Here are a couple pictures:

Radar Derp Radar smile

Leave a comment

Filed under books, Comic, Humor, writing

There’s No Universe in My Brain

Here’s a simile for you: A tree is like a thing that nature made out of wood and leaves.

Here’s another one: My mind is like a cracked pitcher, and the ideas are the water.  (Ok, so it’s an analogy.  Close enough.)

I’ve talked before about my admiration for Tamora Pierce and her ability to create and maintain an entire world in her novels, complete with countries, customs, traditions, history, wars, etc.  Obviously she’s not the only author who can do that, and I do admire anyone else who can juggle a great deal of complex ideas while they create a story that leaves me guessing.  Which leads me to…

John Dies at the End

There’s no link because I already added it to the Books I Recommend page, complete with link.

David Wong, whose writing I first read on one of my favorite websites – http://www.cracked.com/ – (you may know them from their review of Twilight that I linked to a while back) wrote this book in a way that kept me turning the pages.  I was actually reminded of Jim Butcher a little bit, too (See post with Tamora Pierce) even though the subject matter between Wong’s and Butcher’s books differ in a lot of ways.  I was reminded of Butcher because Wong’s book had that same quality of not pulling its punches (Scroll down to my cartoon of The Dresden Files and what I wrote underneath for context).  It didn’t let me rest.  Once it got going, it kept going.  And there’s a sequel coming out, too!

Oy vey.

The thing that I’ve been thinking about lately is…I can’t do that.  I can’t juggle complex ideas, create worlds…keep things straight in my head.  I have to write important dates down immediately or I forget them, and my to-do lists can sometimes comprise just two items.

The analogy I came up with in my head was those kids’ games where the scenes are jumbled up and you have to number them in the order that they happened.  Like this:

Having a book idea in my head is often like that, where I have a bunch of scenes in my head, but they feel jumbled up, and it’s hard to figure out which ones to put where.  And sometimes it’s not as easy as just filling in the numbers.

I swear sometimes it feels like I’m trying to play this game and get the answers right, except some of the scenes are just missing.

And so I’ve got these scenes in my head, and I know I want them to happen at some point, but I don’t even know how they’re going to connect or what else is going to end up in the book yet.  This is a fancy way of saying I have writer’s block, which I have talked about, and linked to, before.

One of my solutions is to just write down what I have, but sometimes, honestly, I’m so bad at organizing my thoughts enough to even do that.  Sometimes, tough as it is to admit, you need to know what’s going to come before and after so you know how the scene will logically play out.  I guess what I’m saying is that I’d make a really sucky author.

…Why did I choose this life of pain?

Word of the Day: Author (n) – See Masochist.

Leave a comment

Filed under books, Humor, writing