Tag Archives: reading

Why Clarisse Can’t Be Ugly (But She Can’t Be Pretty Either)

This may come as a shock to some of you, but I am a huge Percy Jackson fan. There, I said it. It’s okay if this changes how you think about me. I know not a lot of people like Percy Jackson.

(For an example of verbal irony, please see above)

This post will be 1% my thoughts on the new Percy Jackson series on Disney+ and 99% my thoughts on the character of Clarisse. SPOILER ALERT-ISH for Percy Jackson and the Olympians.

My thoughts on the new Disney+ series: Yep. It’s pretty good. I like how it follows the book accurately and didn’t portray Hades as LITERAL SATAN unlike some MOVIE ADAPTATIONS I WILL NOT NAME.

A fiery demon with horns and wings from the 2010 Percy Jackson movie.
“Mwahahahaha! It is I! Hades! See you in Hell, Percy Jackson!”
Photo courtesy of me screenshotting it from my Disney+ subscription

So Clarisse. For those who don’t know, Clarisse is a minor antagonist who pulls a Zuko by the end of the Percy Jackson series and becomes one of the good guys. In the first novel, The Lightnight Thief, Clarisse is described thusly:

The loudest was a girl maybe thirteen or fourteen. She wore a size XXXL CAMP HALFBLOOD T-shirt under a camouflage jacket. She zeroed in on me and gave me an evil sneer. She reminded me of Nancy Bobofit, though the camper girl was much bigger and tougher looking, and her hair was long and stringy, and brown instead of red.

The Lightning Thief (2005)

She is subsequently described a few pages later as “[t]he big girl from the ugly red cabin.” Later still, “[h]er ugly pig eyes [glare] through the slits of her helmet.” Suffice it to say, Clarisse in the book is fat and ugly, and it’s heavily implied that part of the reason she’s ugly is because she’s fat.

Clarisse in the new streaming show is…

A head shot of a young attractive woman with long, curly brown hair.
Photo Courtesy of IMDb

Stunning? Is that okay to say? Her name is Dior Goodjohn, and–setting aside whatever else I say in this post–she does an excellent job as Clarisse.

But what gives? Why isn’t she ugly? Why isn’t she overweight?

Well, Clarisse can’t be ugly of course. See, when Rick Riordan originally wrote this book in the early 2000s, it was okay to equate ugliness with fatness and it was okay to equate a woman’s (or girl’s) attractiveness level with how good of a person she was. In fact, later in the series, Clarisse has a major crush and the characters are all like “Wahhh? But she’s ugly! How can she want to seek out a romantic relationship??” In The Lightning Thief specifically, Clarisse was ugly because she was a bad person, and she was a bad person because she was ugly. Remember, Scrubs, a hugely popular television show, was using its runtime to regularly make hugely transphobic and homophobic jokes. The early aughts were rife with this kind of humor and misguided symbolism.

So Clarisse can’t be fat and ugly in this new show because we’ve finally come to understand that a woman should not be judged by her looks and it’s not okay to shame someone for their appearance.

Except… what are you saying, Disney? Are you telling me you refuse to have a young woman who is overweight and/or unattractive on your new show?

Yeah, that’s exactly what they’re saying. Not just Disney, but the entertainment industry in general, has a problem with casting people who look anything other than gorgeous by society’s standards. It’s the She’s All That problem all over again (and again and again). People don’t go to movies (or stream TV shows) to see ordinary people. Psht. Gross. So therefore only beautiful people may be cast as the ugly people.

Rachael Leigh Cook with her hair tied up and wearing glasses from the movie She's All That
Ahhh! Eek! Hideous! (more verbal irony)
Photo from Business Insider

And if there is a plus-size character, the movie will let you know that this is your one (1) plus-size character whose character development will likely be dependent on one or more of the following: food and the consumption thereof, finding a plus-size character (usually of the opposite sex because of heteronormativity) to fall in love with, being judged for being plus-size, overcoming their own negative self-image that has arisen from being plus-size.

For examples, see Netflix’s Fate: The Winx Saga and the randomly-big-in-current-critique-media (at time of writing) Sleepover starring Kallie Flynn Childress as Yancy, the fat one.

In conclusion: Clarisse in this streaming series could not be ugly (or fat). And she could not be beautiful. The former insinuates that people who aren’t “beautiful” (whatever that entails) are automatically bad people. The latter rejects the possibility of showing a non-beautiful person (whatever that entails) on screen in entertainment media.

It’s a no-win situation.

But yeah, I like the show. I’ll continue to watch when the next season drops.

Leave a comment

Filed under books, Humor, television

Kindle Unlimited for a Limited Time!

Good Hello to You All!

I have missed this blog, so I thought it was time to come back to it. Once upon a time, this was my diary, my timeline, my therapist, my outlet, and a number of other things. I see no reason not to continue that trend. Just a quick update for now:

HELLBOUND is available for a limited time on Kindle Unlimited! Yes, I know that’s ironic! Please consider downloading it. If you haven’t signed up for KU, they usually have a free trial, so you could technically read HELLBOUND for super free!

Click here to be redirected to Amazon. (Yes, we hate Amazon, but capitalism demands that I use every platform available to me. Grrr capitalism.) But hey, look at this awesome cover art! Feel free to follow the artist on Instagram. She’s @sofiamercuri.art

I, too, have a large number of artistic endeavors and social medias! This is likely unrelated to my relatively newly discovered ADHD. Rather than link everything, here’s a nice convenient linktree instead. Thank you in advance for your support! More updates and rambles to come! (Oh, and if you prefer Barnes & Noble/Nook, that’s in the linktree, too.)

Bye for now!

Leave a comment

Filed under books, writing

The Subtle Art of Subtlety

Hello! It’s been a while, but I’m still here. I’m bursting with the need to talk about one of my favorite romance authors. And then maybe next post I’ll talk about another one of my fave romance authors who isn’t that good at writing. Weird, right? It’s the truth that you can learn a lot about what not to do from other people’s mistakes. But first I want to talk about Julie Garwood. As a published romance writer (see how I subtly plugged myself there), I have realized that it’s time to de-stigmatize romance novels. They get so much crap, and for a long time, I was right there slinging arrows with the rest of society. But the fact of the matter is… romance novels are entertainment. People make fun of Rom-Com movies in a similar way, and it’s like… why? People seek emotional catharsis from their entertainment, and many genres provide that without worrying about winning Oscars or whatever. Look at the Fast and Furious series. You think people are watching that for the scintillating dialogue and believable drama? No. They’re watching it to see Vin Diesel do a flying headbutt or to see someone drive a car out the window of one skyscraper and into the window of another. Entertainment doesn’t always have to be believable. It doesn’t even have to be well-written. But you know what? Julie Garwood is a good writer. AND she writes romance! To prove this, I’m going to point out two scenes from my favorite series of romance novels. The first is from Killjoy (2002). This romantic thriller asks you to suspend your disbelief as you follow two characters on a death-defying journey through the mountains as they evade a hired killer. This story belongs to the enemies-to-lovers sub-genre, so towards the beginning of the book, the narration is all about how the leads are frustrated with each other. This includes the following snippet:

…she had vowed that, if he survived, she’d kill him, just for the sheer joy of it.

The title of the book is hidden in that sentence! Isn’t that so cool? “She’d kill him, just for the sheer joy of it.” You think Julie Garwood did that by accident? Heck no. She was having some fun with this. And I appreciate that. But that’s not the kind of subtlety I want to talk about today. No, I want to talk about relationship development and showing-not-telling. So now we’re going to look at Sizzle (2009). In this book, FBI agent Sam is grilling grad student Lyra for details about her life. Someone is trying to kill her, so he’s trying to form a list of suspects. He asks about past relationships, and she says she ended her last serious relationship some time ago. He presses her for her reasons for the breakup, and the narration reveals what she truly thought about her ex.

Not to be bored to death, she thought but didn’t say. In all the time she had known John, she had never heard him laugh really hard, the kind of laugh that brought tears to your eyes and took your breath away.

That quote is from chapter twelve. Then, during a car ride in chapter twenty-six, you get this brief line:

He [Sam] burst into laughter that made tears come to his eyes.

A dozen words. A dozen (and change) chapters later. And right there, you know these two are meant for each other. Because Sam does exactly what Lyra’s ex never did: He laughs so hard that tears come to his eyes. But here’s the thing about subtlety… it’s tempting to counteract a subtle moment with a not-so-subtle lampshade. Garwood doesn’t hang a lampshade on this moment, and I respect that. She doesn’t add narration about Lyra noticing the laughter or feeling a certain way. She just moves on. This accomplishes a few things.

1. Garwood isn’t insulting her readers’ intelligence. If she’d hung a lampshade on it, it would have sent one or two messages. “You aren’t perceptive enough to pick up on this” and/or “Look how clever I am!” Neither of these messages is good.

2. It shows that the two characters are meant for each other. No telling required. The narration doesn’t need to do that heavy lifting because the characters’ actions speak for themselves.

3. It makes nerdy readers (like me) feel proud of themselves for noticing it. Yeah, I’m not afraid to admit that I felt like I’d earned a medal or a cookie for picking up on this. I should be afraid to admit it, and you should definitely feel free to make fun of me relentlessly. But the truth is out there.

As I said above, you can learn a lot from what authors do wrong, but you can also learn plenty from what authors do right. Julie Garwood writes sexy novels, but she doesn’t sacrifice anything in doing so. Her characters are well-rounded, the conflict is compelling, and the relationships feel real. I am a huge fan, and I can’t wait for her next book.

Other places to find me:

Leave a comment

Filed under books, Humor, writing